Others:
thier -> their
consiparation -> conspiration
raher -> rather
thiking -> thinking
maximise -> maximize
organisations -> organizations
mulitple -> multiple
organise -> organize
Recommended read 'A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations' http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x/abstract;jsessionid=221E7DAB8E6292A9D5BD1BECB245F87B.f04t02?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false
;-)
The article is behind the paywall. Here's a link to free version: https://duckduckgo.com/l/?kh=-1&uddg=http%3A%2F%2Fjourhavandesociolog.se%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F02%2Fjoms1072.pdf
I remember the days when we discussed about basic income on this blog.
A while ago, I also reached the same conclusion as you did on this article.
I think one of three things can be redistributed.
1. redistribution of income
2. redistribution of stocks
3. redistribution of work hours
USA citizens may resort to redistribution of work hours si ce they are reluctant to accept income redistribution.
I'm so excited to expect proto-post-scarcity societies triggered by income redistribution.
What if you had some "mechanism" so that it is possible to map a person to exactly one company and a company to N other companies or exactly one person?
company := madeOutOf(1 person | N companies)
1 person -> 1 company
In such a case, we could change this phrase from your article:
"After all, firm isn't a person and can't really strive to maximise profits. Only people can."
To this one:
"After all, a firm is a person and can really strive to maximise profits. Because firms are people."
Maybe the "mechanism", the magic sauce could be ethereum[1] ?
You mean world made only of single-person companies?
yes.
For example:
Marc -> Marc Ltd.
Marie -> Marie Ltd.
And in addition this possibility:
(Marc Ltd., Marie Ltd.) -> Marc & Marie Ltd.
The "glue" behind contracts managed by the network as ethereum promise it.
In this case:
We could change this phrase from your article:
"After all, firm isn't a person and can't really strive to maximise profits. Only people can."
To this one:
"After all, a firm is a person and can really strive to maximise profits. Because firms are
people."
What would be the rest of the article ?