Comments for page "Beyond Rational Idiotism" http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782/beyond-rational-idiotism Posts in the discussion thread "Beyond Rational Idiotism" Sat, 01 Aug 2015 21:49:14 +0000 http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782#post-1928097 (no title) http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782/beyond-rational-idiotism#post-1928097 Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:51:23 +0000 martin_sustrik 939 True. It would add to Bitcoin deflation.

It may be possible that it may not be a problem in the long run. I wrote an essay on that topic: [http://250bpm.com/blog:33]

]]> http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782#post-1928086 (no title) http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782/beyond-rational-idiotism#post-1928086 Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:27:40 +0000 Carulli Hi. Another thing that occurs to me is that as time goes by, there would be more and more money locked, actually there would always be increasing, and it would become a problem for the whole system.

]]> http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782#post-1911898 (no title) http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782/beyond-rational-idiotism#post-1911898 Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:58:40 +0000 martin_sustrik 939 There's no 3rd party to resolve any disputes. Thus, there's no way to decide which party is cheating.
You prove that you were cheated by willing to spend extra money to punish the other party.

]]> http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782#post-1911858 (no title) http://250bpm.com/forum/t-741782/beyond-rational-idiotism#post-1911858 Mon, 09 Dec 2013 19:14:07 +0000 Anonym123 How about another improvement to the rule: If one side cheats, the cheater's deposit will be given to the other side.

]]>