http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282/why-communication-infrastructure-should-use-permissive-licen Posts in the discussion thread "Why Communication Infrastructure Should Use Permissive Licenses" Sat, 01 Aug 2015 21:47:11 +0000 http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282#post-2245637 http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282/why-communication-infrastructure-should-use-permissive-licen#post-2245637 Fri, 06 Mar 2015 02:53:36 +0000 Smithg14 I truly appreciate this post. I have been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You've made my day! Thanks again! gakgadfkdcebkbbe

]]> http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282#post-1981561 http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282/why-communication-infrastructure-should-use-permissive-licen#post-1981561 Sun, 02 Mar 2014 00:02:41 +0000 martin_sustrik 939 Simple answer: Corporate lawyers. Typically they have clear instructions with respect to using software with major OS licenses (GPL, BSD, MIT). Once you want to use something different, you have to go through corporate approval process which may drag on for months

]]> http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282#post-1981558 http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282/why-communication-infrastructure-should-use-permissive-licen#post-1981558 Sat, 01 Mar 2014 23:57:38 +0000 asdf Okay, why not unlicense.org then?

]]> http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282#post-1973651 http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282/why-communication-infrastructure-should-use-permissive-licen#post-1973651 Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:23:18 +0000 martin_sustrik 939 AFAIK "public domain" is not a legal concept in some countries.

]]> http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282#post-1973530 http://250bpm.com/forum/t-620282/why-communication-infrastructure-should-use-permissive-licen#post-1973530 Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:05:03 +0000 asdf Why not public domain?

]]>